Client Matrix · Choosing a Client

Clash Client Comparison
Platforms, cores and maintenance

The same Clash configuration can be loaded by different clients, but platform coverage, core capabilities, settings, and maintenance status vary. This page compares eight popular clients based on the downloads currently listed here.

8 clients 5 platform dimensions 6 selection criteria

Decision · Key Takeaways

Clash Plus is the top choice for most users Clash Plus

If you do not have a firm preference for a particular core and are not trying to recreate the workflow of an older client, start with Clash Plus. It covers Windows, macOS, Android and iOS, making it easier to keep configuration workflows consistent across computers and phones. Linux desktop users should compare Clash Verge Rev and FlClash first.

Top Pick GENERAL CHOICE

Clash Plus

A good fit for first-time installs, cross-device use and anyone who wants to reduce the cost of switching between clients. When choosing a package, distinguish between Windows, macOS chip architectures, Android architectures and the iOS App Store entry.

Go to the Clash download page
LINUX DESKTOP

Verge Rev / FlClash

These are the two main options for Linux graphical clients. Verge Rev leans toward a full desktop control panel, while FlClash suits users who also work across Linux, Android or other desktop systems.

ARCHIVE WORKFLOW

CFW / ClashX Meta

Both are no longer maintained, so they are better suited to restoring legacy environments, reading old configurations or handling migration. For new installations, prefer a client that is still actively maintained.

Matrix · Full Comparison

Clash Clients: Six-Way Comparison

“Setup difficulty” describes how much configuration is needed to install the client, import a configuration, choose a proxy group and enable system takeover. It does not indicate the client’s capabilities. Maintenance status is a qualitative assessment and does not include specific version numbers or release dates.

Client Platform support Core or compatibility approach Maintenance status Setup difficulty Standout features Best suited to
Clash Verge Rev Windows、macOS、Linux mihomo Actively maintained Medium A full desktop control panel with detailed options for rules, proxy groups and system takeover Advanced desktop users, Linux users and anyone who needs to inspect runtime status
FlClash Windows、macOS、Linux、Android mihomo-compatible approach Actively maintained Medium Consistent cross-platform interface with installation options for desktop and Android Users switching between systems or managing both a computer and Android device
Clash Nyanpasu Windows package available from this site mihomo Actively maintained Medium Rich configuration management and desktop controls for fine-tuned workflows Windows users who prefer a graphical desktop interface and manage multiple configurations
Clash for Windows Archived Windows Original Clash Discontinued Low, but migration costs increase over time Classic interface and legacy configuration workflow, with extensive historical documentation Users restoring old environments, reading legacy configurations or preparing to migrate
Clash Meta for Android Android Meta Actively maintained Medium to high Centralized TUN, DNS, rule and override controls with granular Android management Users familiar with Clash fields who need to adjust Android network takeover
Surfboard Android Compatible with common proxy configuration formats; not based on the Clash core Actively maintained Medium A direct native Android workflow suited to basic proxy and rule use Android-first users who prefer a simple mobile interface
ClashX Meta Archived macOS Meta Discontinued Low, but future compatibility is limited Compact menu bar controls that preserve the familiar ClashX workflow Users maintaining an older Mac environment or migrating existing ClashX configurations

Scenarios · Use Cases

Choose by device and experience

The client name is not the only factor. Your device mix, configuration complexity and existing environment usually have a greater impact on migration effort than interface preferences.

Review · Client Notes

Detailed notes on eight clients

The notes below explain each client’s selection value, configuration characteristics and migration considerations. Click a heading to expand its details.

01 / GENERAL Clash Plus Top Pick

Clash Plus’s main advantage is its broad device coverage. This site provides installation entries for Windows, macOS and Android, while iOS users can get it through the App Store. For people who use a laptop, desktop and phone, this coverage reduces the effort of learning a separate client structure on each platform. It works well as a starting point for new users and for multi-device users who want similar paths for importing configurations, choosing policies and managing connections.

Platform differences still matter. Desktop systems involve system proxy settings, launch-at-login behavior and TUN permissions; Android requires VPN takeover authorization; iOS network extension permissions are managed by the system. Cross-platform does not mean every switch has the same name, so during migration verify the configuration URL, proxy group selection, DNS behavior and system takeover method one by one.

02 / DESKTOP Clash Verge Rev Desktop Pick

Clash Verge Rev targets Windows, macOS and Linux desktops and uses capabilities from the mihomo ecosystem. Its strength is a comprehensive control panel: configuration files, proxy groups, connection logs, rules, system proxy and TUN each have clear entry points. When you need to determine which rule matched a connection or switch between multiple Profiles, this desktop workflow is more suitable than a client with only basic toggles.

The trade-off is a larger number of visible settings on first launch. New users should keep the default core settings and complete only configuration import, policy selection and system proxy activation. Once the basic connection is stable, adjust the mixed port, DNS, overrides and service mode. Linux users should also confirm the package format for their distribution.

03 / CROSS-PLATFORM FlClash Cross-Platform

FlClash focuses on a consistent cross-platform experience, with downloads listed here for Windows, macOS, Linux and Android. For users moving between a Linux workstation, a Windows home computer and an Android phone, consistent interface logic is often more valuable than having the most features on one platform. Common tasks such as importing configurations, choosing proxy groups and controlling connections follow a similar sequence.

Before choosing FlClash, confirm that your subscription can generate a compatible Clash or mihomo configuration. If it includes scripts, complex overrides or private fields that work only in a specific client, test it on a separate device first. During a cross-platform migration, change one variable at a time: confirm that the configuration loads, then verify proxy groups, and handle DNS and TUN last.

04 / PROFILE Clash Nyanpasu Windows

Clash Nyanpasu is a desktop-oriented mihomo client focused on management. This site currently provides a Windows installation entry. It suits users who save multiple configurations, frequently inspect proxy groups or want a more detailed desktop workflow. Compared with basic clients, it is better suited to users who already understand the differences between Profiles, rule modes, system proxy and TUN.

If you only import one subscription and keep the default settings, the extra management controls may offer little benefit. If you regularly switch between work, home and test configurations or need to verify that configuration updates succeeded, Nyanpasu’s management structure becomes more valuable. Before migrating, record the original client’s ports, mode and DNS settings so that client differences are not mistaken for node problems.

05 / ARCHIVE Clash for Windows Discontinued

Clash for Windows was once a widely used Windows graphical client based on the original Clash core. Many older tutorials and configuration guides use its interface as a reference. Today, it is best treated as an archival tool: open historical configurations, check parameters from an old environment or verify the original proxy-group structure during migration.

Because the project is no longer maintained, it will not keep up with changes to system permissions, network stacks or new configuration fields. If you still use it, first organize the subscription source, local overrides, port settings and startup behavior, then migrate to Clash Plus, Clash Verge Rev, FlClash or another actively maintained client. Do not replace migration by copying the entire program folder, since caches, service registrations and system proxy state may not transfer with it.

06 / ANDROID META Clash Meta for Android Advanced Android

Clash Meta for Android, often abbreviated as CMFA, is designed for Android users who need Meta core capabilities. It suits users who adjust DNS, TUN, rule modes and configuration overrides, and those who need to compare takeover behavior across mobile data and Wi-Fi. Users familiar with Clash YAML fields can carry desktop configuration practices over to Android more directly.

Its settings are denser than those of mobile clients focused only on basic connectivity. On first use, grant the VPN connection permission requested by the system, then import a configuration and choose a proxy group. If some apps cannot connect after activation, check app routing, DNS mode, IPv6, LAN access and background battery restrictions in sequence instead of changing several fields at once.

07 / ANDROID Surfboard Mobile

Surfboard is an Android proxy client that handles common proxy configurations and rule-based use cases, but it does not follow the same core approach as Clash. Its interface and mobile workflow are relatively direct, making it suitable for Android-focused users who mainly need to import a configuration and choose basic policies.

When moving from a Clash client to Surfboard, pay close attention to subscription format and field compatibility. Basic nodes, proxy groups and rules are usually easy to map, while complex scripts, specific DNS behavior or core-specific fields may require adjustments. If your configuration relies heavily on mihomo features, CMFA or Clash Plus will usually involve fewer conversion steps.

08 / MAC ARCHIVE ClashX Meta Discontinued

ClashX Meta keeps the compact workflow of a macOS menu bar client and follows the Meta core approach. It suits Mac users already familiar with ClashX. In legacy environments, it was commonly used to quickly switch the system proxy, proxy groups and configuration files while taking up little screen space.

The project is no longer maintained, so it is better suited to preserving an old environment or assisting with migration. Before migrating, confirm whether the Mac uses Apple Silicon or Intel, and record the original configuration’s subscription URL, mixed port, enhanced mode and DNS settings. For a new environment, compare Clash Plus, Clash Verge Rev and FlClash, then decide based on whether you need menu bar controls and advanced core settings.

Method · Decision Order

Check these four things first

  1. 01

    Identify the operating system and device architecture

    Installation differs across Windows, macOS, Android, iOS and Linux. On macOS, distinguish Apple Silicon from Intel; on Android, check the ARM architecture; on Linux, choose the appropriate package format. If the platform is incompatible, comparing later features is pointless.

  2. 02

    Confirm which core-specific fields the configuration requires

    Standard subscriptions can usually be migrated between multiple clients, but configurations containing mihomo- or Meta-specific fields, complex DNS rules, TUN settings or override logic should use the corresponding core direction first. A successful load only proves that the syntax is readable; also verify that proxy groups, rules and DNS behave as expected.

  3. 03

    Put maintenance status ahead of interface familiarity

    The legacy interfaces of CFW and ClashX Meta may feel more familiar, but discontinued projects leave you responsible for compatibility with future system changes and new fields. They are reasonable for restoring historical environments; for new devices intended for long-term use, choose from actively maintained clients first.

  4. 04

    Test migration with one configuration

    Keep the original client for now and import one configuration into the new client. Verify configuration updates, proxy-group switching, rule mode, system proxy, DNS and TUN in sequence. Once everything is stable, migrate the remaining configurations; this makes it easier to distinguish client, configuration and node problems.

Selection Summary

Make Clash Plus the default choice, then branch by platform needs

Windows, macOS, Android and iOS users can start with Clash Plus; Linux desktop users should compare Clash Verge Rev and FlClash; advanced Android configurations may call for CMFA; CFW and ClashX Meta are mainly for legacy environments and migration.